The Intelligent giving blog

What you baaargained for?

Elizabeth Milligan - Friday, November 30, 2007

Charity sheep ‘SAY NO TO RUBBISH PRESENTS ’ is the message from Helen Mirren, Will Young and friends in the season’s advertising for Oxfam’s ‘famously funusual' Christmas gift catalogue. Apparently, us Brits waste £1.2bn a year on unwanted presents – and Oxfam (see profile) wants to change that. Send condoms to AIDS victims, or a loo to the disposessed, through Oxfam, and we can all save the world and avoid pointless presents at the same time.

So it says. But Oxfam does not have the monopoly on these gifts. And it certainly isn't the best at explaining how your cash will actually help. 'Funusual' presents aren't as simple as they at first might seem.

Oxfam, like many charities, doesn’t put your money where your goat (or condom, or loo) is. Buy a condom, and your cash could be spent on running a sexual-health clinic. Buy a loo, and your gift could transform into cash for running a sanitation project. Clever stuff.
"Some catalogues do offer gifts that actually do what they say on the tin"
But we stick-in-the-muds don't approve. We don't argue with Oxfam's assertion that the money from its gift catalogue should be spent where the need is greatest. But we think that all charities should be upfront with their supporters about where donors' cash is spent. And Oxfam isn't. It tucks away the details on its website, and the wording is not clear.

Condoms from Oxfam ActionAid (see profile), on the other hand, is a good fairy. The description of every gift on its Gifts in Action website explains that the gift is merely an example of where your money could be used. It's roughly the same setup as at Oxfam, but ActionAid is much more transparent.

Some catalogues, however, do offer gifts that actually do what they say on the tin. The Good Gifts Catalogue is our favourite. It offers the widest range, from real goats sent to Africa, to paying for a scheme to get British grannies dancing.

The key point here is: are you getting what you are paying for? If you paid for a toaster in a shop and were given an iron, how would you feel? Equally, if you paid for a goat and ‘got’ a tenth of a goat, and then a lot of other animal husbandry tools, should you feel misled? We think that honest advertising should help you decide where you spend your money, and there's not enough of that in the world of virtual charity gifts.

- The Christmas Charity Gift Awards 2007


Login or register to comment


Submitted by flipthebucket temp (not verified) on Sat, 01/12/2007 - 1:25pm.

Thanks for a thoughtful post. I do agree that there should be more transparency. I don't think most people will mind if they don't get exactly what it says on the side of the tin as long as they are told so. Those who do mind should probably check their motives for giving, perhaps they are in danger of throwing money at charities in order to justify their lifestyle or distance themselves even further from the poor. One of my fav catalogs is from TEAR Australia. It's called Arguably the Worlds Most Useful Gift Catalog and you can find it at: http://www.usefulgifts.org/
Thanks again, I've just subscribed and I'll keep it on.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.