The Intelligent giving blog

The inner life of Stephen Bubb

Adam Rothwell - Friday, June 6, 2008

Wine bottles Stephen Bubb likes to think of himself as the voice of the voluntary sector; he plugs himself as the ‘bosses’s boss’. But if he speaks for charities, then charities are a whole lot weirder than I thought.
Here are some things I have learnt about Bubb’s inner life, from his astonishing blog.
  1. One’s success in life can be measured by the number of VIPs spoken to. It’s a commonplace in the charity sector to say that Bubb is a consummate networker. But the sheer extent to which he rattles on about speaking to Mr X and writing to Lord Y and having tea with Dame Z never fails to astonish. The thing that worries me about this is that Bubb doesn’t delight in getting these people to do stuff for him – he delights in having met them at all. For an organization that’s supposed to be focused on ‘outcomes’, Bubb’s focus on meeting people important people for undisclosed reasons strikes me as perverse.
  2. Charities should spend more on fripperies. Bubb’s meagre salary of approx. £85,000 doesn’t stop him complaining about life’s privations. Recently, he’s admitted to fare-dodging to get himself into first class on a train, and he’s reflected that charity bosses of his stature really ought to be given first-class tickets as a matter of course. Is it puritanical of me to be shocked by this attitude?
  3. Wine and public-service delivery ought to be one’s priorities. When not being silly (see above), Bubb writes with genuine passion about the need for charities to get a better deal from government on public-service-delivery contracts. And he writes with similar enthusiasm for wine. As a wine-nerd myself, I would love to have known more about the dinner he describes where he drank (in order) Laurent-Perrier Ultra Brut champagne, ‘a superb Chassagne-Montrachet’ and a ‘1988 Claret [sic]’. Yum yum. Particularly the ’88. Anyone know which chateau?
Despite these eccentricities, I think the charity sector needs Stephen Bubb more than Bubb needs the charity sector. Which makes his blog – and hilariously stuck up reactions to it – all the more amusing.
 

 


Login or register to comment



 

Get the IG Blog delivered by email. Just enter your address:

 Or subscribe to our RSS feed

Delivered by FeedBurner

Submitted by Ginsters Dragon on Fri, 06/06/2008 - 11:18am.

With regard to point one - the sector's full of them. The CEO of a previous charity I worked for did little but attend society lunches, (fruitlessly, for the charity he was representing I might add) and prattle on incessantly about his CMG which was largely the result of years of lobbying the 'right kind of people'.

I'm not accusing Mr Bubb of having such a self serving streak though!

 

Don't shoot the messenger


Submitted by David Abse (not verified) on Fri, 06/06/2008 - 11:13am.

I have no personal reason to dislike or object to Stephen Bubb (I've met him once or twice, he seemed pleasant enough) but I am not sure that the charity sector needs Stephen Bubb more than he needs it, nor ACEVO. Bubb has been incredibly successful at getting his voice heard, or as he might say "the voice of the voluntary sector" at high government levels, and perhaps because of this success, one shouldn't begrudge his odd glass of Claret or two. I have much more concern, however, that in reality Bubb/ACEVO have done little more than actually meld in with existing government policy and ensure that the voluntary sector is led more and more down a service delivery, commissioning-led path, to the disadvantage of the sector, the public who pay for and receive services, and local democracy, as less and less services are being delivered by accountable bodies.

Just a thought.


Submitted by SSE on Fri, 06/06/2008 - 11:07am.

Whatever you think, Bubb's blog is great reading, and there are gems amongst all the frippery. He's sticking well to the blogging 'rules' (honesty, directness, passion, continuity, authority etc) and I'm really impressed by it so far. It would be far worse if he was trying to be someone he's not, or trying to spin things. You got more truth about his view of Futurebuilders, for example, than you would ever have got through normal media channels.

And I like the fact that he's unashamedly bringing the whole of himself to it. Would that more CEOs in the sector were as open and honest about their life and work.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.