While I disagree with CND and rather like the tank museum, each has their moments.
Both educated (though one had at times a rather slim grasp of reality). Both had links to the military.
As has been said though, one was pretty political.

But how political can you be? Greenpeace has been political. Come to think of it, many of the larger charities have campaigned from time to time, some spend a good chunk of time campaigning.
Politics means change can be affected.
So how far should charities go to make themselves out of business?
And should something that acted like some charities be a charity?

Come off it, Bruce - there's a clear difference between Charities, which do things that most right-minded people would agree are worth doing, and CND which is a political animal and which many right-minded people would say is 'barking', and would have lead to WWIII if anybody had actually listened to it.